| Compare-Theory-Report All fields 003 | Page Format |
| | likelihood to suffer costs imposed by external events even after policies have been |
| | altered. PIWP Keohane and Nye, 1989 p.9-13 as noted in CTIR, Dougherty & Pfaltzgaff |
| | 1997, pp 102-103T =========== |
| | see also note on Neofunctionalism as a theory of regional integration emphasizes the |
| | political calculation and pay-off to elites who agree to collaborate in the performance |
| | of certain tasks (Viotti, P. and M. Kauppi, (eds.). 1987. International Relations Theory. |
| | Macmillan Publishing Company, New York).Http://www.irtheory.com/know.htm |
| | Definition-power |
| | Measure-success |
| | Motivation-Actors | States can cooperate, Institutions play a role. neoliberal institutionalists assume that |
| | states concentrate on absolute gains |
| | Foreign-relations-internat-sys: | the decline of military force as a policy tool and the increase in economic and other |
| | National-Interest |
| | System-Change-Stability |
| | Prescriptions |
| | Reliability | knowing int'l theory only applies under certain conditions.- if maxim |
| | Literature-Defined |
| | Theoretical-Proposition |
| | Units-Analysis |
| | Instruments |
| | Modern-Theorists |
| | Modern-Works |
| | Post-Cold-War |
| | Limitation |
| | Reference |
| | link |
| | Sort-Catagories |
| | What-necesary-assumption: |
| | How-test |
| Wednesday, 07 May, 2003 | 8:24:27 AM | Page 19 of 27 |